Labels

Adjustable-rate mortgage (1) Advanced Camera for Surveys (1) Africa (1) Ahmed Ghailani (1) American (2) AOL (1) Apple (1) Arizona (1) Ashkelon (1) Australia (1) Barack Obama (4) Beef (1) BenJarvus Green-Ellis (1) Bing (1) Blogger (1) bookmark (1) Brett Favre (1) Bruce Bochy (1) Business and Economy (1) Capital punishment (1) Central League (1) Chandra X-ray Observatory (1) Chesapeake Bay (1) Chicago (1) Chicago Bears (2) Chicago Police Department (1) Christmas Island (1) CNN (2) Colby Lewis (1) Commissioner's Trophy (MLB) (1) Darren McFadden (1) Democratic Party (United States) (1) Detroit Lions (1) Diigo (1) Diphtheria (1) DPT vaccine (1) Dwarf galaxy (1) East Coast of the United States (1) Environmental movement (1) Facebook (1) Federal Housing Administration (1) Financial Services (1) Financial Times (1) Fixed rate mortgage (1) Football (4) Foxborough Massachusetts (1) Foxconn (1) Gabrielle Giffords (1) Gillette Stadium (1) Gmail (1) Google (4) Google Buzz (1) Google Maps (1) Greylock Partners (1) Groupon (1) Guantánamo Bay (1) Guantanamo Bay detention camp (1) Harry Shum (1) Hexane (1) Hubble Space Telescope (2) Huffington Post (1) HuffPost (1) Indianapolis Colts (3) Interest rate (1) Iran (1) Israel (2) Israel Antiquities Authority (1) Jason Campbell (1) John Rooke (1) Jon Burge (1) Juba Sudan (1) Jumbo mortgage (1) Large Magellanic Cloud (1) Lawsuit (1) Lewis Kaplan (1) Loan (1) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (1) Massachusetts (1) Matt Cain (1) Matt Cutts (1) McDonalds (1) Mediterranean Sea (1) Mexico (1) Miami Dolphins (1) Microsoft (1) Middle East (1) Milky Way (1) Minnesota Vikings (1) Monday Night Football (1) Mortgage loan (1) Mortgages (1) MSNBC (1) National Basketball Association (1) National Football League (6) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1) NBA (1) Neanderthal (1) Neftali Feliz (1) New England (2) New England Patriots (6) news (1) News Media (1) Newspaper (1) NFL (8) North Atlantic Oscillation (1) Oakland Raiders (1) Obama administration (1) Old Man Winter (1) Percentage (1) Pertussis (1) Peyton Manning (3) Pfizer (1) Philadelphia Eagles (1) Philanthropy (1) Plant (1) Poker (1) Police misconduct (1) President (1) Pricing (1) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1) Profile (1) Randy Moss (1) Real estate (1) Refugee (1) Republican (1) Research (1) Ronald McDonald (1) San Francisco (2) San Francisco Giants (2) Sarah Parsons (1) Seahawks (1) Search (1) search engine (1) Search Engines (1) Seattle Seahawks (1) Secession (1) Social network (1) Soldier Field (1) Southern Sudan (1) Sports (7) Statue (1) Sudan (1) Supermassive black hole (1) Taco Bell (1) Tetanus (1) Texas (1) Texas Rangers (1) Thanksgiving (1) Tim Armstrong (1) Tim Lincecum (1) Tom Brady (6) Tom Cable (1) Twitter (1) Tyler Thigpen (1) United States (5) United States Chamber of Commerce (1) United States Department of Agriculture (1) United States federal judge (2) University of Virginia (1) US House of Representatives (1) Vaccination (1) Virginia Institute of Marine Science (1) Voting (1) Washington Redskins (1) Web search engine (1) White House (1) Willie Mays (1) World Series (1) World Wide Web (1) YouTube (1)
Live for Headbanger's Ball.

Fear Factory

Mortgage Matters

Sports Blog

Science Playground

Health & Nutrition

Green Planet

Space Odessy

U.S. and the Middle East Conflict

Inside the Mind

Total Pageviews

Diigo

Search This Blog

Powered By Blogger

Jan 30, 2011

Complete preliminary results show 99% vote to split in Southern Sudan - CNN.com

Coat of arms of Southern SudanImage via WikipediaComplete preliminary results show 99% vote to split in Southern Sudan - CNN.com

Complete preliminary results show 99% vote to split in Southern Sudan

By the CNN Wire Staff
January 30, 2011 3:09 a.m. EST
Sudan's north and south have been at war for two decades in a conflict that killed 2 million people
Sudan's north and south have been at war for two decades in a conflict that killed 2 million people
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Preliminary but complete results show almost 99% voted for a split
  • Sudan's north and south have been at war for two decades
  • The conflict left 2 million people dead
(CNN) -- Nearly 99% of Southern Sudanese voted to split from the north, organizers reported Sunday, marking the first complete preliminary results.
With 100% of votes counted, an overwhelming 98.83% voted to split, the Southern Sudan Referendum Commission said on its website.
Sudan's north and south have been at war for two decades in a conflict that killed 2 million people.
The referendum on whether to declare independence from the government based in the north is part of a 2005 peace agreement that helped end the conflict. The war pitted a government dominated by Arab Muslims in northern Sudan against black Christians or animists in the south.
Clooney tells why Sudan is his mission
Southern Sudanese return home
RELATED TOPICS
A majority of Sudan's oil reserves are in the south, another flashpoint in the war.
Several million voters cast ballots, including expatriates in the United States and seven other countries.
The south would become a new nation in July if the vote is validated and no other obstacles emerge.
"If there is no appeal, the final results will be announced on February 7," said Justice Chan Reec Madut, deputy chairman of the commission. "But if there is an appeal or appeals, they have to be discussed, and the final announcement will then be on February 14."
The commission said it faced various challenges during the vote, including time, funding and the complexity of the law.
"The law itself was framed in an unclear way with much repetition. ... It was shaky," said Muhammad Khalil, the commission chairman.
Nevertheless, Khalil said, the referendum commission, which included southern Sudanese and northern Sudanese members, made "decisions in accord."
Khalil said the commission did not have much time to conduct its work.
"It was conceived by those who signed the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that the referendum process would take 42 months," he said. "By the time the referendum commission was established, we had four months."
Funding was also a challenge, Khalil said.
"The international funding was generous, but not made available for Sudanese expertise," he said. "If we had more funding, we would have included more Sudanese experts to give the referendum an added national face."
Logistical difficulties included residents delivering election materials to other counties by foot, officials said.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Jan 26, 2011

Google drops real estate listings | Inman News

Google Logo officially released on May 2010Image via WikipediaGoogle drops real estate listings | Inman News

Google drops real estate listings

Search giant cites low use, proliferation of search sites


Search giant Google will no longer support real estate listings uploaded to its classifed listings site on Google Maps, the company announcedTuesday.
Consumers will no longer be able to find for-sale, foreclosure, or rental properties through the search function on Google Maps, and real estate professionals will no longer be able to upload their listings to Google Base, the company's classifieds site, which is being replaced by Google Shopping APIs and will not support real estate listings.
"In part due to low usage, the proliferation of excellent property-search tools on real estate websites, and the infrastructure challenge posed by the impending retirement of the Google Base API, we've decided to discontinue the real estate feature within Google Maps on February 10, 2011," the company said in a blog post.
Home seekers can still use "Google search results to find helpful real estate information and websites" as well as view local businesses, directions and transit times through Google Maps and explore neighborhoods through Google Street View, the company added.
"This does not come as a surprise to me. Even with Google's huge audience, it shows having listing data is clearly not enough to deliver a good real estate search experience and build audience," said Pete Flint, CEO and co-founder of property search site Trulia.
The company added that Google's removal of listings data will not affect its mobile application, which uses the Google Maps API.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Jan 24, 2011

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Once Again Biggest Spender on Lobbying Activities - OpenSecrets Blog | OpenSecrets

The United States Chamber of Commerce headquar...Image via WikipediaU.S. Chamber of Commerce Once Again Biggest Spender on Lobbying Activities - OpenSecrets Blog |

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Once Again Biggest Spender on Lobbying Activities


chamberlogo.jpgThe U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the perennial No. 1 top spender on lobbying and a vocal opponent of many of the Obama administration's top legislative priorities, once again ended the year with a lobbying surge.


Between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its subsidies spent $50.9 million on lobbying at the federal, state and grassroots levels, according to a Center for Responsive Politics review of reports filed with the Senate Office of Public Records Thursday. That's a 38 percent increase above its third-quarter spending.


Overall in 2010, the Chamber spent $132 million on lobbying, down 8.6 percent from its all-time high of $144 million in 2009. Nevertheless, the Chamber again in 2010 ranked as the No. 1 top-spending lobbying client -- although it should be noted that many organizations, unlike the Chamber, report only federal-level lobbying expenditures in these reports.


In 2009, the Chamber reported a whopping $79 million in fourth-quarter lobbying expenditures amid the legislative home stretch of Democrats' health care reform and Wall Street reform plans.


Fourth-quarter lobbying reports were filed Thursday with the U.S. House and Senate. In the coming days and weeks, the Center for Responsive Politics will be integrating this new information into the OpenSecrets.org lobbying database and sharing trends and analysis here on the OpenSecrets Blog.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Jan 22, 2011

Poker with Ahmadinejad - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of IranImage via WikipediaPoker with Ahmadinejad - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

Poker with Ahmadinejad

Op-ed: After delivering on pledge to stop Iran, Obama to press Israel, Arabs to make peace
Orly Azoulay
Published: 01.20.11, 13:55 / Israel Opinion

When Barack Obama was a college student, he made a reputation for himself mostly as a distinguished poker player. He gained his expertise while being a beach boy in Honolulu, playing cards and drinking at pubs instead of going to school. This experience, which he acquired in his distant past, assists Obama on occasion while managing US foreign policy from the White House. This week it turned out that his most meaningful poker game thus far was played against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Quietly, through a secret channel, the American president hurled numerous powerful bombs on Iran’s nuke site, with Israel’s help - according to the New York Times. The bombs dropped by Obama did not raze home and citizens, did not kill women and children, and were not photographed by foreign correspondents.
Persian Admiration
Cable: Iranians love President Obama / Yuval Mann
New cables reveal rise of ayatollah influence; who you need to know to be successful businessman in Tehran
Full story
Obama’s bombs came in the form of computer viruses that silently managed to destroy the core of the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, in an inspiring operation executed in the framework of an Israeli-American plan to sabotage Iran’s nuke program. Nuclear experts characterized this bombardment as the most sophisticated and imaginative computer weapon that had been invented and implemented to this day.
When Obama ordered the computer attack on Iran, he continued at the same time to reach out to Ahmadinejad and urged him to sit at the negotiating table. Ahmadinejad replied elusively and equivocally, thinking that he is able to fool the whole world. He did not imagine that Obama is playing against him like a professional who learned his trade on the streets, while keeping his cards close to his chest. The world did not know that Obama was in the midst of a war against Iran which he managed through subterfuge.

Obama naïve?

Even before he was sworn-in, Obama received a classified briefing from top US intelligence officials. They told him about the secret plan to strike Iran’s atomic sites with computer viruses .President Bush, towards the end of his term, approved the plan, and Obama was captivated by it and ordered to accelerate it. According to the reports, America, just like Israel, kept the plan a closely guarded secret.
Those who were not parties to the secret were sure that Obama is too naïve and inexperienced. When Obama declared that he will not allow Iran to produce nuclear weapons, few believed him. The skepticism towards him was said to be prevalent especially in Israel, among those who were not aware of what was going on in Dimona and the US national nuke labs in Idaho.
Idaho brought the information to the project, and Israel used its atomic reactor in Dimona to test the virus. The New York Times, which looked into the story for almost three months and held interviews worldwide in order to elicit information, revealed that the mission had been completed: One fifth of the production power of the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz was destroyed. Even the smartest bombs, had they been hurled by the US or Israeli Air force, would not paralyze the site to such extent.
Obama did not destroy Iran’s nuclear program, but he managed to significantly delay it. With this achievement he now plans to press both Israel and Arab states to secure a peace treaty. The White House always suspected that Israel is using Iran as an excuse not to make peace. Now this excuse had evaporated, at least partly, and Saudi Arabia which feared a nuclear Iran no less than Israel will also be called upon by the White House to roll up its sleeves and enlist for the cause of the peace process.
Now that the story had been publicized, Obama would be able to address both sides and tell them that he promised to stop Iran and delivered. Now, he will demand that they do what is required of them.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sea-level study brings good and bad news to Chesapeake Bay

schéma cycle de l'eau atmosphère/océan/glaciersImage via WikipediaSea-level study brings good and bad news to Chesapeake Bay

Sea-level study brings good and bad news to Chesapeake Bay

A new study of local sea-level trends by researchers at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) brings both good and bad news to localities concerned with coastal inundation and flooding along the shores of Chesapeake Bay.
Dr. John Boon, the study's lead author, says the good news is that "absolute sea level in Chesapeake Bay is rising only about half as fast as the global average rise rate." The bad news, says Boon, is that "local subsidence more than makes up for it."
Boon has previously warned of the long-term impacts of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay, particularly in light of the increased likelihood of coastal flooding during hurricanes and nor'easters.
In their report, Boon and his co-authors, VIMS professor John Brubaker and assistant research scientist David Forrest, stress the distinction between absolute sea level—a measure of the volume and mass of ocean water, and relative sea level—the level of the ocean surface measured relative to land (and more specifically a tide gauge).
The authors note that for Chesapeake Bay, relatively moderate rates of absolute sea-level rise, when combined with locally high rates of land subsidence and an increasing coastal population, add up to a significant and growing threat. They call for continued operation of the local tide gauge network and addition of new mapping tools such as LIDAR to aid in smarter coastal planning and improved emergency-response measures.
The VIMS study was funded by the Norfolk District of the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and reviewed by officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Maryland Geological Survey. It is available as a pdf file from the Hargis Library at VIMS.

The Good News
Data from NOAA satellites and tide gauges show that absolute sea level is rising at a rate of about 1.8 millimeters per year in Chesapeake Bay. That's only about half of the globally averaged 3.1-mm per year rate of absolute sea-level rise, as reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (3.1 mm is about a tenth of an inch).
Rates of change in absolute sea level vary widely around the globe. In the Indo-Pacific, sea level is rising as fast as 10 mm per year. In the Gulf of Alaska and other areas, sea level is falling. These regional differences reflect differences in water temperature (warmer water is less dense and takes up more volume than colder water), current patterns, local addition of meltwater from ice sheets and glaciers, and other factors.
The Bad News
The VIMS study, based on a detailed analysis of simultaneous 35-year records from 10 tide gauges between Norfolk and Baltimore, shows that relative rates of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay range from 2.91 to 5.80 millimeters per year. That's the bad news, as even the lowest of these values is higher than the highest rise rates observed in many other localities along the U.S. East Coast. A rise rate of even 2.91 mm per year, when compounded over a century, equals a foot of sea-level rise (a 5.8 mm annual rise rate equals a two-foot rise).
The difference between these local rates of relative sea-level rise and the regional absolute average reflects sinking of the land surface. For instance, the measured rate of relative sea-level rise at Sewell's Point in Norfolk was 4.52 mm per year between 1976 and 2007. Because absolute sea-level rise only added 1.8 mm to the water level, the additional apparent rise in sea level of 2.72 mm (4.52 mm -1.8 mm) must instead be due to land subsidence. The authors write "on average, about 50% of the relative sea level rise measured at Bay water level stations is due to local subsidence."
The mid-Atlantic region is slowly sinking in response to land movements associated with melting of the polar ice caps following the last Ice Age, faulting associated with the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater, local groundwater withdrawals, and other factors. There is no evidence to suggest that local subsidence rates are likely to change significantly in the coming decades.
The Uncertain
Another goal of the VIMS study was to determine if local rates of sea-level rise have increased during the last few decades. As Boon puts it "We know that sea-level is rising, and wanted to find out if it is rising faster now than it did before."
An acceleration in sea-level rise with global warming is predicted by many climate models, and has been observed on a global basis. The IPCC reports that the globally averaged rate of sea-level rise increased from 1.8 mm per year between 1961 and 2003 to 3.1 mm per year between 1993 and 2003. The more recent period coincides with the deployment of satellites that allow for an accurate global picture of absolute sea-level rise.
The results from this part of the VIMS study were inconclusive, largely because available tide-gauge records aren't long enough to allow the researchers to tease a change in the long-term trend apart from year-to-year variability caused by phenomena such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, a see-saw in atmospheric pressure and wind fields between Iceland and the Azores.
The authors conclude "While relative sea level continues to rise at some of the highest rates found along the U.S. Atlantic Coast, there is presently no evidence of a statistically significant increase marking an acceleration in relative sea-level rise" at any of the 5 Bay stations measured. Four of the five stations studied showed an increase in the rate of relative sea-level rise between 1944-1975 and 1976-2007, but none of the increases are statistically significant.
The authors caution that "small but steady increases in relative sea-level rise rate with time are still a possibility." They estimate that an increase "on the order of 0.5 mm per year may be required for a statistically significant acceleration to be confirmed in the years ahead."

Enhanced by Zemanta

Discovery News - Top Stories

CNN iReport - Vetted

Discovery News (Video)

Discovery News - Tech News

CNN.com - Video

Latest financial news - CNNMoney.com

CNN.com

CNN.com - Most Popular

CNN.com - Crime

CNN.com - Entertainment